Skip to main content
Pressure Vessel Engineering

Pressure Vessel Engineering Pressure Vessel Engineering
  • FEA
    • Finite Element Analysis in Action
    • A Step By Step Introduction to FEA
    • How Permissible Cycle Life (or Fatigue Life) is Calculated using FEA
    • The Nuts and Bolts of Stress Linearization
    • Heat Exchanger FEA with Thermal Loads Sample
    • Sample – Seismic Analysis of a Propane Storage Sphere
    • More FEA Samples
    • SolidWorks Simulation Validation (Blog)
    • FEA Methods (Blog)
  • Code Design
    • Audit Vessel
    • Water Softener Vessel
    • Horizontal Retention Vessel
    • Heat Exchanger
    • External Pressure
    • Tower with Wind, Seismic and Vacuum Loads
    • Comparison Between Head Types: Hemi, SE, F&D and Flat
    • ASME Methods Blog
  • CRN
    • Provincial Contacts and Laws
    • Fittings with CRNs
    • Piping – Do I Need a Registration?
    • Burst Testing
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Guide to CRN Numbers
    • Generic Vessel Registration
    • CRN Piping Sample
    • Training
    • CRN 101
    • CRN Survival Guide
  • Pipe Stress Analysis
    • Screenshots of Pipe Stress Analysis In Action
    • Design Optimization with Pipe Stress Analysis
    • Pipe Stress Analysis Sample Report
    • Types of Stresses in Piping Systems
    • Piping Vibrations
  • CFD & Thermal
    • Thermal Design of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger and Mean Metal Temperatures Calculation
    • Thermal Design of an Air Cooler
    • Waste Heat Recovery Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers For Gas Turbine
  • Tools
    • Material Strength
    • Pipe Shell Design Tool
    • Pipe Chart
    • Elliptical Head Design Tool
    • F&D Head Design Tool
    • Hemispherical Head Design Tool
    • Nozzle Design Tool
    • Nozzle with Repad Design Tool
    • Cone Design Tool
    • Cone Layout Tool
  • Contact
  • About
    • Careers
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FEA
  • Code Design
  • CRN
  • Pipe Stress Analysis
  • CFD & Thermal
  • Tools
  • About Us
All Posts By

Martin Hopgood

Sep152017
Share

Joint Efficiency

By Martin Hopgood Uncategorized

A visual primer on ASME VIII-1 joint efficiency. Shows RT-1, RT-2, RT-3 and two options of RT-4.

READ MORE

  • Contact Us
  • FEA
  • Code Design
  • CRN
  • Pipe Stress Analysis
  • CFD & Thermal
  • Tools
  • About Us

Recent Posts

  • Smit
  • Nicole
  • Farhan
  • Pipe Stress Engineer
  • Ryan

Contact: Ray Stroud

519-880-9808 x235

Contact Us

Joint efficiency is a factor required in all head and shell calculations that accounts for how closely a finished weld joint approximates the quality of the seamless parent material. Without further inspection it is assumed the welded joint is weaker than the material around it due to potential defects such as porosity, slag inclusions, and others. Shell thickness and therefore weld quantity is increased to account for this reduction in strength. Code welders following a qualified weld procedure are tested to weld a finished joint that maintains 100% of the parent material strength, but without further testing the allowed strength of a production joint is reduced to 70%.

For some design conditions, such as lethal service, the Code requires the designer to specify full radiography. However, when not required, the designer can specify optional radiographic examination to increase joint efficiency and reduce the required thickness of shells and heads. The designer weighs the material and welding costs against inspection costs to determine which course is best suited for the application. 

The figures below show the ASME VIII-1 joint efficiency values based on Type 1 joints (butt joints fully welded from both sides or equivalent) and degree of radiographic examination. The information is generated using the radiography logic diagrams and samples from Part 7 of PTB-4-2013 ASME Section VIII – Division 1 Example Problem Manual - the PTB-4 'E7.1' through 'E7.4' example numbers are indicated where applicable.

No Radiography
ASME PTB-4 Ref. No.: None
E = 0.70
E = 0.85

Figure 1. Sample vessel illustrating joint locations and efficiency for No Radiography

Visual examination with no radiography is the simplest inspection option. All shell joints (A and B) have an efficiency of 0.70.

The seamless head efficiency is reduced from 1.00 to 0.85 since the shell circumferential seam it intersects is not inspected per code rule UW-12(d). This is shown as the "imaginary" seam H in the figure.

RT-4 Option 1
ASME PTB-4 Ref. No.: None
E = 0.85
E = 0.70
E = 0.85

Figure 2. Sample vessel illustrating joint locations for RT-4 that will improve the shell long seam joint efficiency.

Since circumferential stress governs cylindrical shell design, performing spot radiography on long seams is the easiest way to improve joint efficiency and thus reduce shell thickness.

When specified, spot radiography requires one examination for every 50 feet of the same type of weld, with the provision that each welder's work is represented. One spot could cover all of the Type 1 joints in this vessel if their total length adds up to less than 50 ft. This increases the long seam efficiency from 0.70 to 0.85 and reduces the cylindrical shell thickness at minimal cost.

The head imaginary joint efficiency remains at 0.85 due to UW-12(d).

RT-3
ASME PTB-4 Ref. No.: E7.3
E = 0.85
E = 0.85

Figure 3. Sample vessel illustrating joint locations for RT-3 that will yield the same results as RT-4 Option 1.

RT-3 increases the inspection requirements to spot radiography on both the long and circumferential seams of a vessel. There is no value added for the spot radiography of the circumferential joints since the long seam joint efficiency governs the design and RT-4 Option 1 already increased the long seam efficiency to 0.85.

The head imaginary joint efficiency remains at 0.85 due to UW-12(d).

RT-2
ASME PTB-4 Ref. No.: E7.2
E = 1.00
E = 0.70
E = 1.00

Figure 4. Sample vessel illustrating joint locations for RT-2 that will improve the shell long seam and head joint efficiency relative to RT-4 Option 1 and RT-3.

RT-2 is often used to reduce the thickness of a seamless, non-hemispherical head by improving the head joint efficiency - all long seams must be fully examined to take advantage of this option. 

For the first time rule UW-12(d) is met and the shell long and imaginary head seam efficiencies are 1.00.

RT-4 Option 2
ASME PTB-4 Ref. No.: E7.4
E = 1.00
E = 0.85
E = 1.00

Figure 5. Sample vessel illustrating joint locations for RT-4 Option 2 that will improve the shell circumferential seam joint efficiency relative to RT-2.

RT-4 Option 2 is similar to RT-2, but uses additional spot radiography to improve the circumferential joint efficiency of the shell. This option costs more than RT-2 and yields the same component thicknesses - circumferential seams do not govern the design of cylindrical shells.

Again rule UW-12(d) is met and the shell long and imaginary head seam efficiencies are 1.00.

RT-1
ASME PTB-4 Ref. No.: E7.1
E = 1.00
E = 1.00

Figure 6. Sample vessel illustrating full radiography of all seams.

As shown, RT-1 requires all seams to be examined for their full length and yields E = 1.00 for all joints. RT-1 inspection is required for lethal service.

Table 1. Summary of joint efficiencies for Type 1 joints on shells and seamless heads.


Matt Hiskett, P.Eng
Matt Hiskett, P.Eng.
Engineering Manager
[email protected]
519-880-9808 Ext. 234
Qualification Highlights

Related Reading


  • ASME Methods Blog

    Samples, articles and guides for the design and modeling of ASME pressure vessels.


  • ASME Code Pressure Vessel Design

    Samples, articles and blogs. We discuss when and how code rules work, and when you have to go beyond.

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 519-880-9808

Search Website
© 2023 Pressure Vessel Engineering. |
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy

Pressure Vessel Engineering Ltd.
120 Randall Drive, Suite B
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
N2V 1C6

519-880-9808