Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is required in a submission when code equations cannot be directly applied to the configuration and/or when additional reinforcement needs to be accounted for to obtain acceptable stress values.
B31.3 Code pipe or shell calculations assume a thin uniform cross section. These calculations do not accurately predict the resultant stresses in this scenario.
When code adaptation calculations are performed for the following 24" butterfly valve, a shell-equivalent area is used to calculate the hoop stress.
![]() The equivalent area fulfills t<D/6 Req’t (304.1.2(a)). |
![]() Even though it satisfies the t<D/6 requirement, this equivalent area approach was rejected by the reviewer. FEA is the only alternative. |
|
![]() Due to symmetry, the entire valve can be analyzed by the quarter model shown in the figure. |
![]() A stress linearization was performed on two sections of the body resulting in membrane stresses of 1,129 and 789 PSI, and membrane + bending stresses of 1,449 and 1,034 PSI. |
|
![]() The maximum stress corresponds to a peak stress, as per Fig. 4-130.1 ASME VIII-2. A fatigue analysis yields infinite life cycle to ASME VIII-2 Fig. 5-110.1.1. |
![]() The stresses and corresponding cycle life were acceptable and Ultraflo obtained a CRN#. |
A special thanks to Ultraflo Corporation, #8 Trautman Ind. Dr. Ste. Genevieve, MO for allowing use of their valve geometry for this exercise.